Walk-Squawk Morning Wire

Macro Desk: Markets Finally Blink as Oil, Inflation, and AI Crowding Collide

For weeks, the market has traded as if only one thing mattered: AI. Every dip in semiconductors, mega-cap tech, or momentum names was met with aggressive buying as traders piled into the “AI wins no matter what” narrative.

Tuesday may have been the first real crack in that story.

A combination of hotter inflation data, rising oil prices, and renewed fears around overcrowded AI positioning hit markets all at once, sparking a sharp reversal across tech and momentum stocks.

The biggest shift wasn’t necessarily the headlines themselves. It was that markets finally started reacting to risks they had largely ignored for weeks.

Oil Is Starting to Matter Again

The biggest macro driver remains the ongoing Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Markets had been pricing in a relatively quick resolution or at least assuming disruptions would remain contained. But negotiations between Washington and Tehran appear stalled, with both sides still far apart on core demands.

President Trump called Iran’s latest response “a piece of garbage” and suggested the ceasefire was on “life support,” while defense officials openly discussed plans for escalation if necessary.

That pushed crude oil back above $100/barrel as traders increasingly realize this may not be a short-term disruption anymore.

One growing theme across Wall Street is the so-called “NACHO trade” “Not A Chance Hormuz Opens” a bet that the Strait stays disrupted longer than markets previously expected.

The issue now is that elevated oil prices are no longer just an energy story. They are becoming an inflation story.

Inflation Pressure Is Building Again

Tuesday’s hotter-than-expected CPI report added another layer of concern.

Markets are now beginning to price in the possibility that inflation may stay elevated longer if oil prices remain high and supply chain disruptions continue. Treasury yields jumped, with 30-year yields moving back above 5%.

The concern is simple:

• Higher oil → higher transportation and production costs

• Higher costs → broader inflation pressure

• Sticky inflation → fewer Fed rate cuts

That becomes a major problem for a market trading at historically elevated valuations.

Producer Price Index (PPI) data now becomes the next key macro catalyst, as traders watch for signs that energy inflation is beginning to spread deeper into the economy.

The AI Trade Finally Wobbled

At the same time, one of the market’s most crowded trades AI and semiconductors suddenly looked vulnerable.

The initial spark came from South Korea, where discussions around potential “AI taxes” rattled semiconductor sentiment before officials quickly walked the comments back. Even though the headlines were softened, it was enough to expose just how crowded the trade has become.

Momentum names, software stocks, SaaS companies, and semiconductors were all hit hard during the session.

Goldman Sachs traders highlighted several warning signs developing underneath the surface:

• Heavy retail speculation in a narrow group of AI stocks

• Exploding leverage through sector ETFs

• Aggressive momentum factor crowding

• Short covering fueling upside extensions

• Increasingly narrow market leadership concentrated in semis and mega-cap tech

In simple terms: too many traders are positioned the same way.

That doesn’t mean the AI story is over. It means positioning has become stretched enough that any disappointment whether from inflation, earnings, geopolitics, or policy can trigger sharp reversals.

Markets Are Becoming Extremely Fragile

One of the more important developments underneath the surface is how disconnected market internals have become.

Bloomberg strategist Simon White noted that dealer gamma exposure has surged to extremes while stock correlation remains historically low.

That’s another sign of an increasingly narrow market where a small group of names is doing most of the heavy lifting.

Historically, that kind of setup can work for a while, but it often becomes unstable once momentum begins to slow.

Tuesday’s reversal may have been an early warning shot that markets are entering a more fragile phase where positioning matters just as much as fundamentals.

---

Macro Desk: Dip Buyers Rush Back Into AI Despite Oil and Inflation Risks

Even after Tuesday’s selloff, traders were already stepping back into the AI trade overnight.

Nasdaq futures rebounded while semiconductor stocks pushed higher again as investors continued betting that AI earnings growth can overpower geopolitical and inflation risks.

At the center of the move was Nvidia after CEO Jensen Huang joined President Donald Trump on his trip to China ahead of a major summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The trip immediately reignited speculation that the U.S. and China could ease restrictions around advanced AI chip exports.

That matters because Nvidia’s H200 AI chips sit at the center of the global AI arms race. China remains one of Nvidia’s largest long-term opportunities, with Huang previously estimating the market could eventually be worth $50 billion.

Chinese AI-related stocks surged overnight as traders bet the summit could improve access to Nvidia hardware for Chinese firms.

The Market’s Core Bet Remains the Same

Despite rising oil prices and inflation concerns, investors continue to believe AI earnings growth can offset broader macro risks.

That has created a market where traders are still aggressively buying semiconductors and mega-cap tech whenever weakness appears.

The logic is straightforward:

• AI demand remains explosive

• Chip supply remains tight

• Earnings growth continues to outperform

• Capital spending on AI infrastructure is still accelerating

As long as those trends continue, dip buyers are willing to step in.

But the challenge is that markets are now balancing two competing narratives:

1. AI-driven earnings growth continuing to justify higher valuations

2. Oil-driven inflation potentially forcing interest rates higher for longer

If both continue simultaneously, markets could enter a much more volatile environment where leadership rotates aggressively between growth, energy, defensives, and inflation hedges.

---

Macro Desk: China’s Soybean Demand Warning Could Reshape Global Grain Trade

One under-the-radar development from overnight came out of China’s agriculture ministry.

China now expects soybean imports to decline sharply next year due to a shrinking hog herd and weaker feed demand.

The ministry forecasts soybean imports falling to 95.5 million tons, well below USDA estimates calling for 114 million tons.

That’s a major disconnect and something grain markets will need to monitor closely.

China has historically been the primary engine of global soybean demand growth. A slowdown in imports would increase competition among exporters, particularly between the U.S. and Brazil.

At the same time, Trump and Xi are expected to discuss additional agricultural purchases during this week’s summit, with soybeans and corn likely high on the agenda.

So markets are now trying to balance two competing forces:

• Potentially weaker long-term Chinese soybean demand

• Possible near-term political buying tied to trade negotiations

That could create a much more headline-sensitive grain market moving forward, especially if geopolitical negotiations begin driving export demand again.

---

Grain Desk: USDA Shocked the Wheat Market While Soybeans Found a Biofuel Bid

Wednesday’s WASDE report delivered one major surprise to the grain markets: wheat.

Corn and soybeans came in relatively close to expectations overall, but USDA’s first official estimate for the 2026/27 U.S. winter wheat crop was dramatically smaller than traders expected, sending both CBOT Wheat and KCBT Wheat limit higher.

At the same time, soybeans found fresh support from aggressive crush and soybean oil demand projections tied to the expanding biofuels market, while corn remained stuck in a “comfortable supply” narrative for now.

---

Wheat: USDA Delivered a Major Bullish Shock

The biggest headline from the report was USDA’s estimate for the 2026/27 U.S. winter wheat crop at just 1.048 billion bushels.

That was:

• Far below the average trade estimate near 1.199 billion bushels

• Down sharply from last year’s 1.402 billion

• One of the largest bullish surprises ever seen in a May Crop Production report

The damage was concentrated heavily across the Southern Plains.

USDA projected:

• Kansas wheat production down 132 million bushels year-over-year

• Oklahoma down 42 million

• Texas down 38 million

The issue wasn’t just lower yields. USDA also assumed extremely poor harvested acreage percentages, signaling abandonment remains a major concern across drought-affected areas.

That immediately tightened the U.S. balance sheet outlook.

USDA now sees 2026/27 U.S. wheat ending stocks falling to 762 million bushels from 935 million this year.

That’s not historically “scarce” yet, but it is tight enough to force U.S. wheat prices higher in order to ration export demand and keep American wheat less competitive globally.

Why This Matters

For months, the grain trade has been largely focused on massive South American corn and soybean supplies, weak Chinese demand concerns, and comfortable global inventories.

Wheat suddenly injected a completely different story into the market:

Supply risk.

The market now has to decide whether this becomes a temporary weather scare or the beginning of a much tighter global wheat balance sheet.

The next 4–6 weeks become critical as traders monitor:

• Plains weather improvements

• Harvest abandonment rates

• Global export competition

• Russian and European crop conditions

For now, wheat clearly became the leadership market inside the grain complex.

---

Soybeans: Biofuels Continue to Reshape the Story

While wheat stole the headlines, the soybean complex quietly delivered one of the more structurally bullish reports.

The biggest driver was USDA’s aggressive outlook for soybean crush and soybean oil demand tied to biofuels expansion.

USDA now projects:

• 2026/27 soybean crush at a massive 2.75 billion bushels

• Soybean oil used for biofuels at 17.8 billion pounds

• Soybean oil demand jumping another 3.6 billion pounds year-over-year

That confirms what the market has increasingly been pricing in:

The biofuels story is becoming one of the largest structural demand drivers in the soybean complex.

The EPA’s larger renewable fuel mandates continue pulling more soybean oil into biodiesel and renewable diesel production, tightening the vegetable oil market overall.

That helped push strong gains across:

• Soybean Oil

• Soybeans

• Crush-related trade structures

But There’s Still a Catch

Even with stronger crush demand, USDA still projects relatively comfortable soybean ending stocks overall.

Why?

Because production is still expected to remain large, with USDA assuming:

• 84.7 million planted acres

• Trend yield near 53 bushels/acre

• U.S. production near 4.435 billion bushels

So while the demand side is improving significantly, weather will still ultimately determine whether stocks actually tighten enough to create a major bull market.

The soybean market now increasingly looks like a weather-and-biofuels story rather than purely an export story.

---

Corn: Comfortable Supplies Still Dominate

Corn was the quietest part of the report.

USDA’s first look at the 2026/27 balance sheet largely reinforced the current market belief that corn supplies remain manageable unless weather becomes a problem later this summer.

USDA projected:

• 95.3 million planted acres

• Trend yield at 183 bushels/acre

• Production near 15.995 billion bushels

• Ending stocks at 1.957 billion bushels

In simple terms: not bearish enough to collapse prices, but not tight enough to create panic buying either.

The biggest issue for corn bulls right now is competition.

USDA sharply increased Argentina’s corn crop estimate while also keeping Brazil’s safrinha crop very large.

That means the global export market remains crowded.

Even with rumors of potential Chinese buying tied to Trump-Xi negotiations, USDA did not aggressively raise Chinese corn import projections.

Bottom Line for Corn

Corn still feels stuck in a “weather market waiting room.”

The market likely needs one of two things to break higher meaningfully:

• A U.S. summer weather problem

• A major export demand shift

Without one of those catalysts, USDA’s near-2 billion bushel carryout keeps the market feeling adequately supplied.

---

Bottom Line

This WASDE report may ultimately be remembered as the moment wheat woke the grain market back up.

• Wheat suddenly has a real supply story developing

• Soybeans continue transitioning into a biofuels-driven market

• Corn still remains largely hostage to summer weather

The broader theme across the grain complex now becomes whether weather risk and biofuel demand can finally overpower the heavy global supply narrative that has capped rallies for much of the past year.

This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC and is, or is in the nature of, a solicitation. This material is not a research report prepared by R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC. By accepting this communication, you agree that you are an experienced user of the futures markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, and agree that you are not, and will not, rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions.

DISTRIBUTION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS MAY BE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THIS COMMUNICATION INDIRECTLY SHOULD INFORM THEMSELVES ABOUT AND OBSERVE ANY SUCH PROHIBITION OR RESTRICTIONS. TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION INDIRECTLY AND SOLICITATIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN YOUR JURISDICTION WITHOUT REGISTRATION, THE MARKET COMMENTARY IN THIS COMMUNICATION SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A SOLICITATION.

The risk of loss in trading futures and/or options is substantial and each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Trading advice is based on information taken from trades and statistical services and other sources that R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC believes are reliable. We do not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Trading advice reflects our good faith judgment at a specific time and is subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that the advice we give will result in profitable trades.

R. J. O’Brien & Associates, LLC (RJO) Disclaimer: This communication is not a research report prepared by R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC’s (“RJO’s”) Research Department and should not be considered as such. It also does not provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base a decision to enter into any derivatives business or transaction. This communication is instead part of a general marketing solicitation for you to consider doing derivatives business with RJO, but it is not an offer, a solicitation of an offer, or a recommendation for you to enter into any particular derivatives business or transaction with RJO or any other person. The risk of loss in trading futures and options on futures is substantial and each investor and trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. You should not consider doing derivatives business with any person unless you understand the risks of derivatives and are capable (on your own or with the help of advisors you hire) of making your own independent trading decisions with respect to particular derivative transactions. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Information contained in this communication comes from sources that RJO believes are reliable, but we do not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such.