Walk-Squawk Morning Wire
Macro Desk: Buy the Pullback or Respect the Warning Shot?
The market finally got punched in the mouth Friday.
After weeks of stretched positioning, crowded momentum, heavy call buying and an AI/semi melt-up that looked increasingly unstable, the selloff was not exactly shocking. The bigger question now is whether Friday was the start of something more serious, or simply the reset dip buyers were waiting for.
That is the setup as traders start the week.
U.S. stock futures are trying to stabilize, with Nasdaq futures leading as some of Friday’s hardest-hit chip names attract early dip buying. But this is not a clean “buy everything” tape. The rebound is coming against a rough macro backdrop: oil is higher, yields are higher, Middle East tensions are flaring again, and this week brings a heavy inflation calendar.
The main overnight driver is renewed fighting between Israel and Iran. Missile attacks were exchanged despite President Trump calling for both sides to stop and give peace talks a chance. Israel struck Iranian military targets and reportedly hit the Karun petrochemical company, while Iran launched fresh ballistic missile attacks. The Houthis also threatened maritime traffic in the Red Sea, raising the risk that the conflict bleeds further into energy and shipping markets. Brent crude jumped toward the high-$90s, putting inflation pressure back at the center of the macro conversation.
That matters because the market was already nervous about inflation and rates. Traders are now dealing with the possibility that higher oil prices feed into CPI, PPI, consumer expectations and Fed pricing. The bond market is acting accordingly, with Treasury yields moving higher as rate-hike odds firm.
This is the key difference from a normal buy-the-dip setup: the dip is not just about tech positioning anymore. It is now tied to energy, inflation and the Fed path.
The bears still have the cleaner logic. Positioning is stretched. CTAs are very long. Option activity has been extreme. Semiconductors and AI winners have gone vertical. Some of Friday’s worst-hit names were still up massively over the past year, so one violent down day does not automatically make them cheap.
Friday also exposed how crowded the AI and semiconductor trade had become. Option volume surged to one of the largest sessions on record, volatility finally woke up, and the worst performers were concentrated in high-beta tech, chips, hardware and AI-linked names. Goldman’s Brian Garrett noted that the past month had signs of “too much too fast,” with aggressive upside participation in chip names, extreme Nasdaq/volatility correlation, and heavy levered ETF activity.
That is not normal market behavior.
It also reminded traders that macro still matters. The market had become focused on momentum, positioning, earnings and AI leadership. Then the jobs data hit, rate-cut expectations shifted, and the market had to reprice the knock-on effects. A market priced for perfection does not need much to shake confidence.
The other issue is supply. Equity issuance and secondary offerings remain large. When markets run hot, companies sell stock. That can become a short-term headwind, especially when positioning is already extended.
But the bullish case is not dead.
The bulls still have something powerful: liquidity, buybacks and investors who have been trained to buy every dip before it feels comfortable.
The buy-the-pullback case starts with hedge funds. Goldman Prime data shows U.S. long/short gross exposure fell to 208.4%, only the 8th percentile over the past year. Net exposure fell to 53.9%, around the 66th percentile. That does not scream “everyone is max long.” It suggests at least one major pocket of investors still has room to add risk if the market stabilizes.
Then there is the corporate bid. U.S. companies have authorized roughly $685 billion in buybacks year-to-date, led by tech and financials. The market is entering a period with nearly a full month of limited blackout restrictions, meaning the mechanical buyback bid should remain active. That bid does not care about headlines, short-term panic or whether traders think valuations are stretched. If prices fall, buybacks can become even more supportive.
Valuation is another point the bulls will lean on. The S&P 500 trades around 21 times forward earnings. That is not cheap and remains above the five-year average, but it is also not at the most extreme levels seen in recent years. For dip buyers, the argument is simple: this is expensive, but not yet a blow-off valuation peak.
The semiconductor supercycle is also still part of the bull case. If the current cycle follows prior analogs, there may still be meaningful upside left. That does not mean the trade is low-risk. It means the AI/semi story may not be dead just because the leaders finally had a violent down day.
There are also historical statistics the bulls will point to. Prior Friday selloffs of more than 2.5% in the S&P 500, with the VIX still closing below 25, have historically been followed by positive Mondays. Another study showed that when the S&P 500 was up more than 19% over two months, future returns were historically strong, with stocks higher one month, three months, six months and one year later in all prior cases.
Those stats are not a trading system. But they help explain why dip buyers may not wait for the perfect entry.
So the market is sitting between two forces.
The bearish case is that Friday was the first warning shot. Momentum cracked. Positioning is still stretched. CTA sell thresholds are close. AI leadership is crowded. Volatility finally woke up. Inflation risk is rising again. Energy is no longer helping. Macro data is back in control.
The bullish case is that Friday was a healthy reset. Fundamental hedge funds are not maxed out. Buybacks are active. Valuations are high but not at cycle extremes. The AI/semi supercycle may still have room. And every investor who missed the last leg higher is now looking for a chance to buy weakness.
The calendar now becomes the next test.
Today brings New York Fed one-year inflation expectations. Tuesday has NFIB small business optimism, ADP weekly employment, trade balance and wholesale inventories. Wednesday is the big one with CPI. Headline CPI is expected at 0.5% month over month and 4.2% year over year, while core CPI is expected at 0.3% month over month and 2.9% year over year. Thursday brings jobless claims and PPI, with headline PPI expected at 0.7% month over month and 6.4% year over year. Friday wraps with University of Michigan sentiment and inflation expectations.
For traders, the playbook is straightforward.
If oil keeps pushing higher and yields follow, equity bounces may be harder to trust, especially in long-duration tech and crowded AI names. If oil cools and CPI does not confirm a broader inflation problem, dip buyers likely get more aggressive.
Watch whether the Nasdaq can reclaim leadership, whether semis stabilize after Friday’s flush, whether equal-weight and broader market areas can hold up better than mega-cap tech, and whether CTA thresholds are triggered or avoided.
This is not a confirmed breakdown yet. But it is also not a low-risk reset.
The bears have the logic. The bulls have the buybacks.
This week will likely decide whether Friday was a healthy reset, or the first real warning shot of a larger repricing.
Grain Desk: Cash Update Going Home Friday
Cash markets went home Friday with a softer tone across grains and oilseeds as fund liquidation, favorable U.S. weather and limited China demand weighed on futures. The biggest pressure was in the soy complex, led by soyoil, while corn continued its slide and wheat tried to slow the recent break.
U.S. Cash Market
U.S. corn basis was mostly steady to slightly firmer in select interior locations, but the broader tone remained defensive with futures under pressure. July corn finished the week down nearly 30 cents, with the market now testing levels last seen in October. Farmer selling remains muted on the break, with many producers choosing to wait for the June 30 Acreage and Quarterly Stocks reports rather than chase the market lower.
Interior corn bids were generally steady, though a few eastern locations firmed. Portland, IN was up 3 cents for June and 5 cents for July. Fort Recovery, OH was up 2 cents for June and 3 cents for July. River bids were softer, with the Ohio River July corn bid down 1 cent and Illinois River July down 1 cent.
Soybean basis was firmer at several processors as farmer and elevator movement stayed quiet. The interior processor market showed 20 to 30 cent gains in spots during the week, even as futures broke hard. Cedar Rapids soybeans were up 5 cents for June and 15 cents for July. Council Bluffs was up 40 cents for June. Fairmont and Mankato also showed stronger nearby bids. River bids were mixed, with Ohio River July soybeans up 1 cent while Illinois River June was down 2 cents.
The U.S. soy product market was steady nearby. Spot soymeal held steady, with Central Iowa at -28N, Central Minnesota at -33N and Central Illinois at +14N. Gulf FOB meal was steady, while cash crush margins remained above $3.00. Soyoil basis was steady at the Gulf and interior, though the flat price move was sharply lower as July soyoil was hammered by more than 200 points Friday.
CIF markets were weaker. Gulf soybean bids were down 7 cents for June, down 2 for July, up 2 for August and down 2 for September. CIF corn was also softer, with July down 2, August down 6 and new-crop bids mostly steady to slightly weaker.
South America
South America remained the main source of global soybean business, with China’s buying this week reported out of South American origin rather than the U.S.
Brazilian soybeans traded for July at +78/+80N and August at +90/+93Q. Brazil soybean basis was firmer across the forward slots, with July up 17 cents, August up 13 and September up 20. The Brazilian real was weaker, down 1.79% at 5.1673, which helped keep Brazilian offers competitive.
Argentina soybeans were quiet with no reported trades. Argentina meal and soyoil markets were also reported without trades, though values were marked higher. Brazilian soymeal was also quiet, with July up $2 and August up $3. Brazil soyoil was sharply firmer on basis, with July up 350 points and August/September up 270 points.
Brazil corn was quiet as well, with no trades reported. Late-half October was bid +90Z and first-half December was bid +108Z. Argentina corn was not quoted.
The bigger South America story is weather. Brazil is expected to see a wetter pattern from Mato Grosso do Sul into Parana and Sao Paulo. That rain should slow some fieldwork but may still benefit portions of the safrinha corn crop. The issue is timing. Some areas may get a yield boost, but for other areas the rain likely arrives too late to meaningfully improve production potential.
Argentina is also expected to see rain across much of the country, which should help winter crop prospects. The moisture may cause some short-term fieldwork delays, but the forecast does not point to lasting disruptions.
China
China demand remains the missing piece for the U.S. market.
Domestic Chinese soyoil prices were 70 to 90 yuan lower on the week, quoted at 8,520 to 8,730 yuan. Despite the weekly setback, values remain 1.7% to 2.6% above the recent highs made in February 2025.
Chinese soymeal prices were also lower, down 60 to 80 yuan on the week at 2,740 to 2,850 yuan. Meal remains well below its recent highs from April 2025, down roughly 23% to 27%.
Chinese domestic corn prices were also softer on the week. Jilin was down $4.74 at $330.58 per tonne. Henan was down $0.31 at $336.48. Shandong was down $3.27 at $342.38, while Guangdong was down $0.34 at $368.95. Even with the weekly weakness, prices remain well above year-ago levels, especially in Guangdong, which is up more than $42 per tonne from last year.
The key takeaway is that China’s domestic markets are easing near-term, while import demand remains pointed more toward South America than the U.S. That keeps pressure on U.S. export expectations, especially with no clear sign of major Chinese commitments in corn or soybeans.
Weather
Weather remains a bearish lean for U.S. grains going into the weekend.
The Midwest forecast features regular rounds of showers and thunderstorms over the next two weeks, with breaks between systems likely allowing planting to finish in much of the region. Moisture in place and additional rain should support early crop development and keep production potential high deeper into June.
The main rain focus is from eastern Iowa into central and northern Illinois, Wisconsin and Michigan, along with eastern North Dakota into Minnesota. These are areas where topsoil had recently firmed up, so the additional moisture is viewed as supportive. Temperatures will warm briefly into next week, with some western and southwestern areas reaching the 90s, but cooler air is expected to return late next week.
The Delta and Southeast should see more sunshine than rain, allowing fieldwork to advance. Some rain later in the period will be important for areas that have been drying out.
Market Takeaway
Going home Friday, the cash market is trying to hold together better than futures, especially in soybeans where processor basis improved as farmer selling stayed quiet. But the broader market tone remains defensive.
Corn is under pressure from favorable weather, weak export interest and heavy fund liquidation. Soybeans are being dragged lower by product weakness and the lack of China demand for U.S. origin. Wheat has slowed its decline but remains weighed down by fund selling and cheaper global competition.
The next major market focus is whether favorable Midwest weather continues into mid-June, whether China stays focused on South American soybeans, and whether funds keep liquidating length or begin pressing short exposure.
For now, the cash story is simple: basis is firm where end users need coverage, but futures momentum remains heavy.
This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or agent of R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC and is, or is in the nature of, a solicitation. This material is not a research report prepared by R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC. By accepting this communication, you agree that you are an experienced user of the futures markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, and agree that you are not, and will not, rely solely on this communication in making trading decisions.
DISTRIBUTION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS MAY BE PROHIBITED OR RESTRICTED BY LAW. PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF THIS COMMUNICATION INDIRECTLY SHOULD INFORM THEMSELVES ABOUT AND OBSERVE ANY SUCH PROHIBITION OR RESTRICTIONS. TO THE EXTENT THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION INDIRECTLY AND SOLICITATIONS ARE PROHIBITED IN YOUR JURISDICTION WITHOUT REGISTRATION, THE MARKET COMMENTARY IN THIS COMMUNICATION SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A SOLICITATION.
The risk of loss in trading futures and/or options is substantial and each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Trading advice is based on information taken from trades and statistical services and other sources that R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC believes are reliable. We do not guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Trading advice reflects our good faith judgment at a specific time and is subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that the advice we give will result in profitable trades.
R. J. O’Brien & Associates, LLC (RJO) Disclaimer: This communication is not a research report prepared by R.J. O’Brien & Associates LLC’s (“RJO’s”) Research Department and should not be considered as such. It also does not provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base a decision to enter into any derivatives business or transaction. This communication is instead part of a general marketing solicitation for you to consider doing derivatives business with RJO, but it is not an offer, a solicitation of an offer, or a recommendation for you to enter into any particular derivatives business or transaction with RJO or any other person. The risk of loss in trading futures and options on futures is substantial and each investor and trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. You should not consider doing derivatives business with any person unless you understand the risks of derivatives and are capable (on your own or with the help of advisors you hire) of making your own independent trading decisions with respect to particular derivative transactions. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Information contained in this communication comes from sources that RJO believes are reliable, but we do not represent, warrant, or guarantee that such information is accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such.